A Warning from the Holocaust…. Wake Up! Before It’s Too Late!

Romani arrivals in the Bełżec extermination ca...
Image via Wikipedia

We all have those friends. You know who I’m talking about. The guy who says “I’m just not that into politics.” Or the lady who says “What difference does it make? There all crooks anyway!

Well, I have a Warning For EVERYONE!

First, let me give you the original, Pastor Niemöller’s timeless warning:

They came first for the Communists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up.

But, the modern version would go something like this:

They came first for the militia members,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a militia member.
Then they came for the Oath Keepers,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t an Oath Keeper.
Then they came for the Tea Party,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Tea Partier.
Then they came for me

and by that time no one was left to speak up.

Think about it! If you aren’t doing your part, yet, got to http://www.libertyforge.us and

GET INVOLVED BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Every Tea Party Patriot Should Read This!

Tea Party Movement
Image by wstera2 via Flickr

I did not write the following article, but it lays out EXACTLY what we, as a movement, must do, if we want to be a true “Force to be reckoned with!”

The Author, is Gary North, http://www.garynorth.com, a well respected, and long-time “hard-core” conservative activist.

Eight Unbreakable Rules for Hard-Core Tea Party Activists (or Any Other Special-Interest Coalition)

I joined the conservative movement in 1956 when I joined Fred Schwarz’s Christian Anti-Communism Crusade. I wrote an anti-FDR high school term paper in 1958. I supported the Goldwater for Vice President movement in 1960. I voted for Goldwater for President in 1964. I voted for Reagan’s Republican primary gubernatorial challenger in 1966, William Penn Patrick, because I thought Reagan was too liberal. (I was right; he imposed income tax withholding in his first term as governor.) I was Ron Paul’s first research assistant in 1976.

I am hard core. I have been hard core for a long time.

I am writing this for those of you who are equally hard core.

Here are ten facts of American national politics that you must understand to get meaningful change.

1. You can’t beat something with nothing.
2. 80% of politicians respond only to two things: (1) fear; (2) pain.
3. Bureaucrats (tenured) respond only to one thing: budget cuts.
4. Political reform never comes as long as the tax money flows in.
5. The #1 goal is to reduce the government’s funds, not re-direct them.
6. Congress’s club system sucks in 80% of new members by term #2.
7. Politicians listen to their peers, not to their constituents.
8. Money from the government buys off most voters.
9. Most citizens care little about politics and know less.
10. This gives influence to organized swing-vote blocs.

The political system was summed up a generation ago by the man I regard as the elder statesman of the hard-core wing of the American conservative movement, M. Stanton Evans: “Evans’s Law of Political Perfidy.”

When our friends get into power, they aren’t our friends any more.

To this, I add North’s Law of Partisan Politics:

When a movement is in either political party’s hip pocket, it will be sat on.

If you do not believe this, then you are a sheep for the shearing — and then, after several shearings, the roasting. You are on some politician’s menu.
THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

These are eight basic rules of engagement. There may be others, but these are fundamental. If you do not believe these, you are headed for disappointment.

1. Vote for a hard-core challenger on the other side against a squishy incumbent. This rule separates the hard core members from the soft core members. It has a corollary: A first-term incumbent next election is easier to beat than a squishy incumbent this election. It is always hard to defeat an incumbent. Do what you can to defeat any incumbent, no matter which party he belongs to, if he is squishy on the issue you regard as fundamental. Why is this so important? Incumbents must become deathly afraid of your movement. Take out a few dozen of them in the next election and the one that follows, and many others will cooperate. As Sen. Everett Dirksen put it so long ago, “When we feel the heat, we see the light.” In short, you do not settle for the lesser of two evils. You eliminate them both, one election at a time: first the softie, then the newbie.

2. Hold your newly elected politician’s feet to the fire the first time he breaks ranks on a key vote. He is like a puppy. When he leaves a mess on the carpet, get out the switch. “Bad dog! Bad dog!” Let him remember that switch. Let him fear that switch. The second time he does it, warm up the car. You and he will be taking a trip to the pound. You are his voter only for as long as he is your representative. Politicians respond to only two things: fear and pain.

3. Get him to sign a resignation letter. Before you work for him, make sure he has signed a resignation letter. This letter says the following:

To the voters of [district, state]:I am making this public. If I ever vote for [whatever], I will turn in my letter of resignation to the [government body] within 24 hours.

If I fail to do this, I expect voters to vote against me at the next election, since I clearly cannot be trusted.

I expect my opponent in the primary to defeat me next time, and if he doesn’t, my opponent in the general election will. And should.

Very truly yours,

Name Candidate for [whatever]

This is a political suicide letter. You will see who is serious about your #1 issue and who is not by means of a signed resignation letter. Post it online. If he refuses to sign it, start working to undermine him after he defeats the squishy incumbent. Above all, do not trust him.

No candidate will sign more than a few of these. Any candidate who will not sign at least one is just another glory-seeking, power-seeking, retirement bonanza-seeking political hack. Like a drone bee who is useful only once in his life, he is useful for only one thing: defeating a squishy incumbent.

You say he refuses to sign? Don’t donate any money or time to his campaign. You should vote for him against a squishy incumbent, but you will immediately start working to replace him.

4. Track all of his votes on your #1 issue, and post them online. The Congress deliberately seeks to conceal voting results. Your committee must keep track of every vote related to your interest. This means that someone must follow the voting schedule. If there is no record of his vote, call his office. Ask for an email with his vote recorded. My suggestion: make sure he has an assistant send an email to your committee after every vote in this area, explaining it. Post all of this without alteration. If he breaks ranks, make sure you have a clear statement of why this was a bad vote.

This is boring. This is time-consuming. This is vital. You must see if there is a pattern in his voting on your issue.

I wish there were watchdog sites that cover every vote. Be sure there is one for your special interest.

WordPress is free (www.WordPress.org). A domain name costs $10 a year to register. A multi-site hosting service like Hostgator is $10 a month or less. Have a separate site for every candidate and elected official.

This would make a great civics project for home schoolers: track a candidate for the school year. Then turn the task over to a new student. Have the committee run the sites, but students can do the grunt work. It is good practice.

5. Find out who his largest campaign donors are. This will tell you who will have the most clout when he takes office. Investigate the PACs. Investigate the donors who send in the maximum donation allowed. Are they members of one group? Post this information on the site that you set up to monitor his votes.

6. Instill fear. This is your #1 task, once he takes office.

7. Inflict pain. This is the basis of #6.

8. Trust, but verify. If your group refuses to verify, it should not trust.
CONCLUSION

Politics is not based on love, because civil government is based on coercion. Do not impose “tough love” on a politician. He is not to love you. He is to obey you. You are not to love him. You are to monitor him. Impose negative sanctions and positive sanctions wisely.

Politicians surround themselves with young men and young women who serve as staffers, plus a few old-timers who have survived in the staffing system and who are unimpressed with their bosses, but are even less impressed with the boss’s constituents. Politicians spend time in each other’s company. They are not much impressed with their colleagues, but they are very impressed with themselves. They are not impressed by their constituents. Finally, they spend time raising money. So, they have to spend time with lobbyists.

I shall now end my little lesson on politics with a verbatim citation from one of the great masters of state-wide politics, Jesse Unruh. He was the Speaker of the California Assembly in the late 1960s. He was known as Big Daddy. He ran against Ronald Reagan in 1970 and lost. But he later was elected state Treasurer. Here is what he said about the proper attitude toward lobbyists:

“If you can’t eat their food, drink their booze, screw their women, and still vote against them, you have no business being up here.”

So committed was he to this philosophy of life that he chose to die of prostate cancer at age 65 rather than have his prostate surgically removed, because he would not risk the sexual impotence that might result from surgical removal.

He loved dealing with lobbyists.

We are dealing with dedicated people. We are dealing with power-seeking, often ruthless people. Don’t try to buy them off. Don’t try to sweet-talk them. If they don’t vote the way you want them to vote, defeat them. This, they understand. This, they fear.

Either they are on your menu, or you are on theirs. I suggest the former.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thank You Oklahoma Patriots! Now Back to Work!

Patriots
Image by Marissa Babin via Flickr

I woke up that first morning after, Wednesday 7/28/10, still in a bit of a daze. It was done, over, finite. And for what? Then my heart turned to the candidates. Even Tuesday evening I felt heartache for each one of them and their families. As the day progressed I could see, or, more accurately, feel, the same feelings from many other supporters. Some expressed themselves, but there was a painful aching quietness in the forums where we have found our voice. We have begun to put our boots back on and pick up our armor to keep fighting. We must. It is our duty. Do or die.

But before I launch into my version of a call to action, let me take a moment to say “Thank You.”

To our Liberty & Constitution Candidates –

We owe you a debt of gratitude that words cannot convey. Through much prayer you, and your families, stepped out and made personal commitments and sacrifices for the cause of Liberty. You stood as beacons of hope to a group of confused citizens waking up in a dark hour. Many times we tried to put you on pedestals, but time after time you would climb down to work side by side with us and reach out to more people. Through physical, mental, and emotional exhaustion, financial strains, and, at times, shock and horror at the activities of others, you didn’t quit. Your head was held high. You gave us a rally point, leadership, and a way to be involved. Seeing one of your signs is a bittersweet moment, but we would do it all over again.

To the many volunteers –

For some of you, this wasn’t your first rodeo – Thank you for sharing your wisdom and experiences. For many of us it was our first time – Thank you for stepping out of your comfort zones and getting involved. All of the volunteers that stood up and said “I will be counted, I will not go down without a fight, I will stand in the gap.” Thank you for your time, your money, your service, and your prayers.

Now that we have taken a moment to breathe and catch a little sleep – we must keep moving. The message of Liberty, duty, honor, and responsibility reached many people, but there are still many, many more to reach. I know we are not the first citizens to realize we need a restoration in this country, but we have been in danger of being the last, or not even existing ourselves. Years of apathy have gotten us to this point. Some of us have finally awakened. Now it’s our turn to give new meaning to the phrase “The Great Awakening.” There are so many cliché phrases I could use to remind us why we should still vote in the runoffs and general elections. Just remember, the war is not over. It will not be over this November and it will not be over in November 2012.

Liberty is a responsibility – it must be maintained.

Before I go, I would like to ask that we take a moment to create some type of memorial to this courageous fight in 2010. The “winners” always write the history books. This is our opportunity to prove we are not silent and our voices will be heard. I invite all of you – candidates, campaign staff, volunteers, citizens – to share some of your memories, personal experiences, and photos from this campaign season. There will come a time when we are part of history. The entire story should be told. It is the responsibility of our local, state, and national party to represent all of us, even if we didn’t “win.” If they won’t do it, let’s do it ourselves.

Thank you for your time, your sacrifice, and your indulgence. God Bless America!

Thank you!

Dawn M Blevins

Enhanced by Zemanta

Letter from the Tulsa 9-12 Project to KFAQ About the USA Patriots & John Sullivan

Gadsden Flag
Image by Fresh Conservative via Flickr

Politics makes strange bed fellows

In an effort to mislead voters, John Sullivan claimed in a letter sent to constituents that he had “received the endorsement of the Tulsa Tea Party in this election.”  FYI:  There is NO Tulsa Tea Party.  Tulsa Tea Party
disbanded October 2009, with its members directed to Tulsa 912 Project and OKforTEA.  www.tulsateaparty.org

Tulsa now has OKforTEA and the USA Patriots as their choices for Tea Party associations.  As the Tulsa Tea
Party disbanded last October, Tulsa Tea Party, Tulsa 912 Project and OKforTEA, worked together to create a smooth transition for the members involved.

People often ask why the TEA Parties in Tulsa can’t unite and work together. Tulsa 912 Project is not a Tea Party but shares similar values and goals of most conservative organizations involved in the Tea Party movement.  Having worked with Tulsa Tea Party and OKforTEA and having had dealings with the
USA Patriots, I can say the reason they can’t work together is differences of opinion and motivation.  Most are involved out of concern for our country, others are in it for the money.  Tulsa 912 recognizes the
importance of unity and works well with the other grassroots organizations. Efforts have been made by OKforTEA and Tulsa 912 to work with Cris and Mike Kurtz, founders of USA Patriots and owners of Kurtz Design, to no avail.  The Kurtz’s initial intentions were probably good as they rode the wave of
public anger as the Tea Parties began to form.  Then they saw an opportunity to capitalize on the movement.  (Please note, I am all about capitalism… just be honest and straightforward about what you’re doing.)  OKforTEA approached the Kurtz’s in regard to working together to provide one Tax Day Tea Party for Tulsa, they were turned down.   But I digress …

Sullivan is intentionally misleading people to believe that the conservative, grassroots organizations are behind him, when in fact the true grassroots organizations considers him part of the problem (establishment), and not the solution.

The letter further states,

“The Tulsa Tea Party, organized by the USA Patriots group in Tulsa have helped shape the political arguments in many state races this year.”

Once again, a misleading statement.

The USA Patriots did NOT organize the Tulsa Tea Party and the only political argument I can see they have shaped, is getting Ruth Hartje to run for Treasurer and their spectacle of an event, “Tea Party Congress,” where, according to their website (www.theusapatriots.com),

“all U.S., Statewide, Judicial and County Candidates are invited to a Congress of members and interested Tea Party activists. Each candidate will have an opportunity to address our Tea Party Congress. “

Tom Coburn and John Sullivan were top billing (no surprise there).  We know how that turned out. Not everyone was allowed to speak.  The bias of the USA Patriots and the behavior of its members was even noticed by news reporters.

For the record, *John Sullivan is endorsed ONLY by the USA Patriots*.

Tulsa 912 Project, through a vote of our members decided to NOT endorse any candidates as an organization.  OKforTEA made the same decision.   As individuals we may do as we wish.

Jai Blevins, founder of Tulsa Tea Party has selected his list of who he is endorsing, on his blog http://okeveryman.com/. John Sullivan’s name is nowhere on there.  Hmmmmm… and yet, Tulsa Tea Party endorsed him?

Lies, lies and more lies. With this letter came a copy of “Community Spirit’s Political Endorsement,” another attempt to mislead his constituents into believing the Christian based magazine endorsed him as their candidate.  Correct me if I’m wrong but that is a paid ad made to look like an endorsement.

Special thanks to the 912 member that made me aware of this mailing.  She received it on Friday afternoon and was hopping mad about the lies and wanted to know what I was going to do about it.  The people are no longer ignorant voters.  We recognize smoke being blown up our skirts and we don’t like it.  Deceiving the public is never good; truth always wins.


Ronda Vuillemont-Smith
Tulsa 912 Project
918.853.7986

When you can’t make them see the light, make them feel the heat. ~ Ronald
Reagan

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tulsa Tea party Founder Endorsements for the July 27th GOP Primary!

Tulsa Tea Party
Image by randylane via Flickr

I have been asked numerous times for a Comprehensive list  of my endorsements in the July 27th GOP Primaries, as the founder of the Tulsa Tea Party.  So, I have put together this list of candidates that,  I believe, best embody the ideals of the  Tea Party Movement. In some of the races,  such as US Congress District 2, there were several quality candidates to choose from. In others, such as the Governor’s Race,  the choice is very clear. If a race is not listed here, it means that, either, I do not know enough about the candidates in the race, or that none of the candidates, in that race, fit the ideals of smaller Government, and opposition to all Federal Government Bailouts of  Private Industry, that the Tea Party Movement was founded upon.

So, here are my endorsements:

Randy Brogdon for Governor of Oklahoma

John Wright for Lt. Governor of Oklahoma

Scott Pruitt for Attorney General

Nathan Dahm for US House OK District 1

Dan Arnett for US House OK District 2

RJ Harris for US House OK District 4

James Lankford for US House OK District 5

David Mclain for Oklahoma Senate District 10

Tim Coager for Oklahoma Senate District 34

David Tackett for Wagoner County Commissioner District 1

Ken Yazel for Tulsa County Tax Assessor

Drew Rees for Tulsa County Commissioner District 3

Race Tightening for GOP Governor Nomination in Oklahoma!

DSC_4798
Image by sroemerm via Flickr

For Immediate release

July 22, 2010

Contact: Rick Carpenter 918-638-6722

GOP Governors Race Tightens

Fallin 37%, Brogdon 26%, Undecided 37%

A survey conducted this week by the Brogdon campaign shows a considerable tightening in the GOP race for Governor. The phone survey was automated and asked participants to push a button with the corresponding choice of Mary Fallin, Randy Brogdon and Undecided.

The survey asked few questions, therefore no crosstabs are available. Brogdon Communications Director Rick Carpenter, who conducted the survey, said “Although the survey was not deep in its reach, it was broad. These numbers are based on over 12,000 complete responses from voters representatively distributed across the state. That is the largest sample of any poll made public.”

A similar survey conducted 6 weeks ago by the Brogdon campaign but not released publicly, showed Brogdon: 11%, Fallin: 36%, and Undecided: 53%. Since then Brogdon has gained 15% while Fallin has been statistically flat. “Not every campaign can afford a DC polling firm, we have to make-do,” said Carpenter. “However, this is an accurate snapshot of where the horserace is right now. They might not admit it, but the Fallin campaign knows its true.”

Candidate Randy Brogdon said he always knew his message would move voters, and “as awareness of the race has grown so has our support. I have seen it at our campaign events and in the number of volunteers showing up to help.” Brogdon continued, “a lot of people have burned up a lot of shoe rubber and its making up for a lot of money we just don’t have. Also, many voters are just becoming aware of Rep. fallin’s support for the banking bailout.”

Brogdon said he has always felt he was going to win because “the Lord has called me to this task.” Brogdon credits part of his success to the fact that his campaign has been more issue oriented, and that he has been a more accessible candidate than his opponent, “I’ve shown up anywhere people will listen and I have stayed until the crowd runs out of questions.” However, most of the credit goes to thousands of volunteers. “I am going to have a lot of people to thank on election night and none of them will be lobbyists or their checkbooks,” concluded Brogdon.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Nathan Dahm for US Congress Oklahoma District 1

This is Nathan Dahm’s Commercial in the Oklahoma 1st Congressional District Primary Race!

Who Is Your Pick for the Oklahoma US Congress District 1 GOP Primary?

************************************************UPDATE******************************************************

Final Results of the Poll:

Total votes Cast: 211

Nathan Dahm: 101

Patrick Haworth: 59

John Sullivan: 36

Kenneth Rice: 14

Fran Moghaddam: 1

Again, this poll had some issues, because I forgot to block both Cookies an IP addresses from Repeat voting, when I first released it. This led to one candidates camp figuring that out, and gaming the system, so that their numbers were increasing at a rate of approximately 20 votes per minute. So, I deleted that poll, and recreated it. Following that, the poll moved at a more normal rate. So, these numbers ARE representative of the readers of this blog, and those whom I reach through Twitter and Facebook.

These numbers, actually, are fairly similar to most of the Straw Polls that have been run in District 1 in the last 3 months, with one exception. While Nathan Dahm continues to gain steam, and John Sullivan continues to lose ground, Sullivan’s decline is accelerating,  and a 2nd candidate has passed him. Patrick Haworth is starting to make noise, and it looks like this race may come down to the 2 newcomers, with the RINO Bailout voter John Sullivan being the odd man out. Also, as I have said before, both Kenneth Rice and Fran Moghaddam, are non-factors in this race!

*******************************************************************************************************************

Because of the Questionable way in which the numbers were moving in the previous poll, I have deleted it, and started over!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Who is your pick for the Oklahoma Lt Governor GOP Primary?

******************************************UPDATE***********************************************

Final Poll Results

Total Votes: 105

John A Wright: 79

Todd Lamb: 17

Paul Nosak: 9

This race really doesn’t seem to have captured quite the interest of most of the other races. However, it looks like, amongst the hardcore Tea Party Movement, which are most of my readers, that John Wright, like Randy Brogdon, really resonates. His high conservative rating during his time in the State House of Representatives, as opposed to the Lukewarm Conservative rating of Todd Lamb, definitely carries alot of weight. Paul Nosak, is starting to gain a little ground in some of the straw polls, he still trails both Wright & Lamb.

*******************************************************************************************************************

Enhanced by Zemanta

Who is your pick in the Oklahoma Governor GOP Primary?

DSC_4798
Image by sroemerm via Flickr

********************************************UPDATE***************************************************************

Final Poll Numbers

Total Votes: 250

Randy Brogdon: 116

Mary Fallin: 90

Robert Hubbard: 39

Roger Jackson: 5

As per usual, any poll run in Tulsa County, or by a Tea Party site, Randy Brogdon wins handily. Mary Fallin is still running second, but a third candidate, Robert Hubbard is making his presence known, as well. Hopefully, those who wish to make sure we get a True Constitutional Conservative in the Governor’s Mansion, will put their considerable weight behind one candidate, in order to prevent the Bailout RINO Mary Fallin from winning the nomination. If we cannot all coalesce behind one candidate, we will be stuck with just another Big Government, Progressive, masquerading as a Conservative!

********************************************************************************************************************

Enhanced by Zemanta