Great PRIVATE Social Network! Perfect for Tea Party Patriots who are concerned with Privacy!

I know you’ve been hearing all the news about social networks and the privacy issues and the selling of user information to advertisers, companies, etc.

Well I got invited to a new social network that keeps it’s members information TOTALLY private and so I joined.  They don’t let search engines crawl the site, AND they don’t sell any of my information.

They don’t even allow Ads because Ads can have stuff like spyware, malware and tracking software.

Instead they charge $10 a month but it’s worth it to me to know my information is kept private and is not for sale.

Plus I really like what the company stands for.

They give away 10% of all their revenues to charities that the community recommends.  They call it Social-Minded Social Networking!  (Like it!)

Oh…the name of the company is Crazygood! (Love that!) And to motivate everyone to invite their friends, they share half of the $10 with the members who help them build this community.

So come be my “Crazygood” friend…it’s better :) It’s by invitation only so THIS IS YOUR INVITATION!

Email me at batcot@gmail.com for your PERSONAL Invite key, then go to http://www.crazygood.com, click Join Now, enter your email address and the Invite key, in the space provided, then invite your friends!

Have a CRAZY GOOD day!

(And I know you, you’re thinking ‘but my network is free’, no it isn’t, you pay with your information.  And you don’t get to share in the company revenues do you….well…do you….didn’t think so!  Just giving you a hard time. But it’s true.)

Enhanced by Zemanta

Every Tea Party Patriot Should Read This!

Tea Party Movement
Image by wstera2 via Flickr

I did not write the following article, but it lays out EXACTLY what we, as a movement, must do, if we want to be a true “Force to be reckoned with!”

The Author, is Gary North, http://www.garynorth.com, a well respected, and long-time “hard-core” conservative activist.

Eight Unbreakable Rules for Hard-Core Tea Party Activists (or Any Other Special-Interest Coalition)

I joined the conservative movement in 1956 when I joined Fred Schwarz’s Christian Anti-Communism Crusade. I wrote an anti-FDR high school term paper in 1958. I supported the Goldwater for Vice President movement in 1960. I voted for Goldwater for President in 1964. I voted for Reagan’s Republican primary gubernatorial challenger in 1966, William Penn Patrick, because I thought Reagan was too liberal. (I was right; he imposed income tax withholding in his first term as governor.) I was Ron Paul’s first research assistant in 1976.

I am hard core. I have been hard core for a long time.

I am writing this for those of you who are equally hard core.

Here are ten facts of American national politics that you must understand to get meaningful change.

1. You can’t beat something with nothing.
2. 80% of politicians respond only to two things: (1) fear; (2) pain.
3. Bureaucrats (tenured) respond only to one thing: budget cuts.
4. Political reform never comes as long as the tax money flows in.
5. The #1 goal is to reduce the government’s funds, not re-direct them.
6. Congress’s club system sucks in 80% of new members by term #2.
7. Politicians listen to their peers, not to their constituents.
8. Money from the government buys off most voters.
9. Most citizens care little about politics and know less.
10. This gives influence to organized swing-vote blocs.

The political system was summed up a generation ago by the man I regard as the elder statesman of the hard-core wing of the American conservative movement, M. Stanton Evans: “Evans’s Law of Political Perfidy.”

When our friends get into power, they aren’t our friends any more.

To this, I add North’s Law of Partisan Politics:

When a movement is in either political party’s hip pocket, it will be sat on.

If you do not believe this, then you are a sheep for the shearing — and then, after several shearings, the roasting. You are on some politician’s menu.
THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

These are eight basic rules of engagement. There may be others, but these are fundamental. If you do not believe these, you are headed for disappointment.

1. Vote for a hard-core challenger on the other side against a squishy incumbent. This rule separates the hard core members from the soft core members. It has a corollary: A first-term incumbent next election is easier to beat than a squishy incumbent this election. It is always hard to defeat an incumbent. Do what you can to defeat any incumbent, no matter which party he belongs to, if he is squishy on the issue you regard as fundamental. Why is this so important? Incumbents must become deathly afraid of your movement. Take out a few dozen of them in the next election and the one that follows, and many others will cooperate. As Sen. Everett Dirksen put it so long ago, “When we feel the heat, we see the light.” In short, you do not settle for the lesser of two evils. You eliminate them both, one election at a time: first the softie, then the newbie.

2. Hold your newly elected politician’s feet to the fire the first time he breaks ranks on a key vote. He is like a puppy. When he leaves a mess on the carpet, get out the switch. “Bad dog! Bad dog!” Let him remember that switch. Let him fear that switch. The second time he does it, warm up the car. You and he will be taking a trip to the pound. You are his voter only for as long as he is your representative. Politicians respond to only two things: fear and pain.

3. Get him to sign a resignation letter. Before you work for him, make sure he has signed a resignation letter. This letter says the following:

To the voters of [district, state]:I am making this public. If I ever vote for [whatever], I will turn in my letter of resignation to the [government body] within 24 hours.

If I fail to do this, I expect voters to vote against me at the next election, since I clearly cannot be trusted.

I expect my opponent in the primary to defeat me next time, and if he doesn’t, my opponent in the general election will. And should.

Very truly yours,

Name Candidate for [whatever]

This is a political suicide letter. You will see who is serious about your #1 issue and who is not by means of a signed resignation letter. Post it online. If he refuses to sign it, start working to undermine him after he defeats the squishy incumbent. Above all, do not trust him.

No candidate will sign more than a few of these. Any candidate who will not sign at least one is just another glory-seeking, power-seeking, retirement bonanza-seeking political hack. Like a drone bee who is useful only once in his life, he is useful for only one thing: defeating a squishy incumbent.

You say he refuses to sign? Don’t donate any money or time to his campaign. You should vote for him against a squishy incumbent, but you will immediately start working to replace him.

4. Track all of his votes on your #1 issue, and post them online. The Congress deliberately seeks to conceal voting results. Your committee must keep track of every vote related to your interest. This means that someone must follow the voting schedule. If there is no record of his vote, call his office. Ask for an email with his vote recorded. My suggestion: make sure he has an assistant send an email to your committee after every vote in this area, explaining it. Post all of this without alteration. If he breaks ranks, make sure you have a clear statement of why this was a bad vote.

This is boring. This is time-consuming. This is vital. You must see if there is a pattern in his voting on your issue.

I wish there were watchdog sites that cover every vote. Be sure there is one for your special interest.

WordPress is free (www.WordPress.org). A domain name costs $10 a year to register. A multi-site hosting service like Hostgator is $10 a month or less. Have a separate site for every candidate and elected official.

This would make a great civics project for home schoolers: track a candidate for the school year. Then turn the task over to a new student. Have the committee run the sites, but students can do the grunt work. It is good practice.

5. Find out who his largest campaign donors are. This will tell you who will have the most clout when he takes office. Investigate the PACs. Investigate the donors who send in the maximum donation allowed. Are they members of one group? Post this information on the site that you set up to monitor his votes.

6. Instill fear. This is your #1 task, once he takes office.

7. Inflict pain. This is the basis of #6.

8. Trust, but verify. If your group refuses to verify, it should not trust.
CONCLUSION

Politics is not based on love, because civil government is based on coercion. Do not impose “tough love” on a politician. He is not to love you. He is to obey you. You are not to love him. You are to monitor him. Impose negative sanctions and positive sanctions wisely.

Politicians surround themselves with young men and young women who serve as staffers, plus a few old-timers who have survived in the staffing system and who are unimpressed with their bosses, but are even less impressed with the boss’s constituents. Politicians spend time in each other’s company. They are not much impressed with their colleagues, but they are very impressed with themselves. They are not impressed by their constituents. Finally, they spend time raising money. So, they have to spend time with lobbyists.

I shall now end my little lesson on politics with a verbatim citation from one of the great masters of state-wide politics, Jesse Unruh. He was the Speaker of the California Assembly in the late 1960s. He was known as Big Daddy. He ran against Ronald Reagan in 1970 and lost. But he later was elected state Treasurer. Here is what he said about the proper attitude toward lobbyists:

“If you can’t eat their food, drink their booze, screw their women, and still vote against them, you have no business being up here.”

So committed was he to this philosophy of life that he chose to die of prostate cancer at age 65 rather than have his prostate surgically removed, because he would not risk the sexual impotence that might result from surgical removal.

He loved dealing with lobbyists.

We are dealing with dedicated people. We are dealing with power-seeking, often ruthless people. Don’t try to buy them off. Don’t try to sweet-talk them. If they don’t vote the way you want them to vote, defeat them. This, they understand. This, they fear.

Either they are on your menu, or you are on theirs. I suggest the former.

Enhanced by Zemanta

FOXNews.com – Students at Lincoln Memorial Told to Stop Singing National Anthem

This is utterly appalling!! The US Parks Police tried to justify themselves with this statement:
“The area they were standing in and singing is an area that is restricted for this type of activity,” said Sgt. David Schlosser. “The United States Park Police is absolutely content-neutral when it comes to any sort of demonstrations in these areas.”
How is the National Anthem NOT content-neutral? This is UNBELIEVABLE!

From: http://ping.fm/aaPm8

Thank You Oklahoma Patriots! Now Back to Work!

Patriots
Image by Marissa Babin via Flickr

I woke up that first morning after, Wednesday 7/28/10, still in a bit of a daze. It was done, over, finite. And for what? Then my heart turned to the candidates. Even Tuesday evening I felt heartache for each one of them and their families. As the day progressed I could see, or, more accurately, feel, the same feelings from many other supporters. Some expressed themselves, but there was a painful aching quietness in the forums where we have found our voice. We have begun to put our boots back on and pick up our armor to keep fighting. We must. It is our duty. Do or die.

But before I launch into my version of a call to action, let me take a moment to say “Thank You.”

To our Liberty & Constitution Candidates –

We owe you a debt of gratitude that words cannot convey. Through much prayer you, and your families, stepped out and made personal commitments and sacrifices for the cause of Liberty. You stood as beacons of hope to a group of confused citizens waking up in a dark hour. Many times we tried to put you on pedestals, but time after time you would climb down to work side by side with us and reach out to more people. Through physical, mental, and emotional exhaustion, financial strains, and, at times, shock and horror at the activities of others, you didn’t quit. Your head was held high. You gave us a rally point, leadership, and a way to be involved. Seeing one of your signs is a bittersweet moment, but we would do it all over again.

To the many volunteers –

For some of you, this wasn’t your first rodeo – Thank you for sharing your wisdom and experiences. For many of us it was our first time – Thank you for stepping out of your comfort zones and getting involved. All of the volunteers that stood up and said “I will be counted, I will not go down without a fight, I will stand in the gap.” Thank you for your time, your money, your service, and your prayers.

Now that we have taken a moment to breathe and catch a little sleep – we must keep moving. The message of Liberty, duty, honor, and responsibility reached many people, but there are still many, many more to reach. I know we are not the first citizens to realize we need a restoration in this country, but we have been in danger of being the last, or not even existing ourselves. Years of apathy have gotten us to this point. Some of us have finally awakened. Now it’s our turn to give new meaning to the phrase “The Great Awakening.” There are so many cliché phrases I could use to remind us why we should still vote in the runoffs and general elections. Just remember, the war is not over. It will not be over this November and it will not be over in November 2012.

Liberty is a responsibility – it must be maintained.

Before I go, I would like to ask that we take a moment to create some type of memorial to this courageous fight in 2010. The “winners” always write the history books. This is our opportunity to prove we are not silent and our voices will be heard. I invite all of you – candidates, campaign staff, volunteers, citizens – to share some of your memories, personal experiences, and photos from this campaign season. There will come a time when we are part of history. The entire story should be told. It is the responsibility of our local, state, and national party to represent all of us, even if we didn’t “win.” If they won’t do it, let’s do it ourselves.

Thank you for your time, your sacrifice, and your indulgence. God Bless America!

Thank you!

Dawn M Blevins

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tulsa Tea Party Founder Endorsements in the GOP Primary Runoffs

"Republican Party Elephant" logo
Image via Wikipedia

I have been mulling over the choices in the GOP Primary Runoffs across the state, and have decided to make known my official endorsements in these races. As usual, if I don’t list a race, either I refuse to endorse anyone, or i don’t know enough about the candidates in the race. Also, if any candidate voted for, or endorsed any of the Bailout votes, they will not be receiving my endorsement.

US Congress District 2

I have decided to endorse Daniel Edmonds over Charles Thompson in this race. I believe that Mr Edmonds best represents the Tea Party ideals in this race, and also, best represents the “citizen legislator” ideal. Please, if you are in CD02, take a look at his statements on the issues, and vote for him in the Runoff.

US Congress District 5

This is the seat that is being vacated by Mary Fallin, in her pursuit of the Governor’s Mansion. My endorsement in this race has not changed, and remains with James Lankford, whose stated reason for running, is

“…I am overwhelmed by the direction of our nation and I cannot keep waiting for someone else to do what needs to be done.  In the past, we have sent career politicians to Washington D.C., now I believe we need to send people who have real lives and real passions.”

This statement is the reason I first endorsed him, and continues to be the reason that I endorse him.

Insurance Commissioner

I have decided to endorse John Doak in this race, simply based on the deceptive ads the John Crawford ran, claiming an endorsement from Senator Tom Coburn. These ads turned out to be from his 1998 Campaign, and Senator Coburn has come out on record as saying that he does not endorse Mr. Crawford in this race. After learning of that, I researched Mr. Doak, and found that he also, is the only candidate in the race who has signed on to the Federal lawsuit against ObamaCare. So, Mr. Doak has my endorsement, and vote in the upcoming runoff.

Wagoner County District 1 Commissioner’s race.

I am again endorsing David Tackett for this post. Mr. Tackett was the leader in the charge to stop the unnecessary “Bell’s Tax” that would have raised the Sales Tax in the County by more than 1/2 percent and, as it turned out, would still not have covered the total cost of the project. Mr. Tackett has also been an avid supporter of the Tea Party movement since it’s inception. I believe that Mr Tackett will make an excellent County Commissioner, who will continuously defend the people of Wagoner County from unnecessary Taxes.

If any of my readers have good information on any other runoffs, please leave a comment. After the runoffs, I will release my endorsements for the General Elections.

Enhanced by Zemanta